Issue Brief Employee Ownership

Manufacturing and Employee OwnershipA succession strategy for the industrial base

Sixty-three percent of small- and mid-sized manufacturing owners are 55 or older, and conventional buyers increasingly favor offshoring or closure over continuation. ESOPs offer an alternative that preserves production capacity, protects worker jobs, and delivers measurably higher productivity. This brief lays out the case.

Jack Moriarty and Laura Hohenberger
Published February 2026 · 6 min read
Close-up of a laser cutting machine shearing metal, with bright orange sparks streaming across the frame.
The industrial base depends on thousands of owner-operated firms. Succession is the next battle for American manufacturing.

The demographics of business succession pose a serious risk to the strength and productive capacity of the U.S. manufacturing base.

Baby boomers make up the largest group of business owners in the country.1 As this generation reaches retirement age—a phenomenon known as the “silver tsunami”—a record number of privately held businesses are facing a change of ownership in the next five years.2 Too often, exiting business owners either 1) close the business for lack of an interested buyer or family successor or 2) have little choice but to sell to a competitor or offshore buyer that may not be committed to keeping jobs and production in the United States.3

In the manufacturing sector, the silver tsunami is especially acute, with more business owners approaching retirement age than the U.S. firm average.4 Nearly two thirds of all manufacturing businesses have an owner that is aged 55 or older and nearly a third have a business owner that is 65 or older. This means that the majority of American manufacturing businesses are likely to experience an ownership transfer in the next five to ten years. At a conservative estimate, this translates to about 150,000 American manufacturing companies (comprising approximately 180,000 unique establishments) that could be at risk of closure or offshoring.5 Policymakers can confront this demographic threat to our manufacturing base by creating conditions for Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) to become a more viable option for business succession.

What is an ESOP?

The ESOP is a proven succession alternative to closure or offshoring. It is both a financing vehicle and a tax-advantaged retirement plan that helps employees build ownership in the company where they work. The company contributes shares into an ESOP trust, and employees earn shares over time—at no cost to them. For owners, an ESOP can be a flexible way to sell some or all of the business and transition leadership while keeping the company operating.

Six-step illustration of how an ESOP works: 1) The owner sells shares to the ESOP trust and may defer capital gains; 2) The ESOP trust holds shares for employees; 3) The lender provides financing to purchase shares from the selling shareholder; 4) The company repays the acquisition loan over time through free cash flow; 5) Employees receive shares allocated to individual accounts as the loan is paid down; 6) When employees leave or retire, the trust repurchases their shares.
Figure 1. How an ESOP Works

Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) are an alternative to closure or offshoring

Selling a closely held manufacturing business to an ESOP is an opportunity to preserve domestic production while building retirement wealth for American workers. ESOP companies are shown to be more resilient, grow faster and lay off fewer workers during economic downturns than competitors.6 Recent evidence suggests further that ESOP-owned manufacturing firms post higher labor productivity than their peers, making the growth of ESOPs part of a broader strategy to address productivity challenges in the U.S. manufacturing sector.7

ESOPs have a strong track record of success in the manufacturing sector

There are more ESOP companies in the manufacturing sector than in any other industry. While less than 4% of all U.S. firms operate in the manufacturing sector, manufacturers represent over 20% of all ESOPs nationwide.89 Manufacturing’s capital-intensive production and long investment horizons make the sector particularly well suited to employee ownership, as ESOPs encourage reinvestment and operational continuity. By strengthening worker retention in skilled roles where training costs are high, ESOPs support the stability and productivity needed for manufacturing firms to remain competitive.

Employee ownership can help convert the wave of retiring manufacturing owners into a competitive advantage

Business succession presents a clear risk to our industrial base, but we can turn those risks into opportunities by creating favorable conditions for the growth of employee ownership. ESOPs face both capital access and regulatory barriers that have impeded their growth, but addressing these issues offers an additional tool to prevent offshoring and the loss of U.S. productive capacity.

By reducing the financing and regulatory barriers that currently discourage the sale of U.S. businesses to their employees through an ESOP, policymakers have a bipartisan opportunity to enable U.S. manufacturers to retain their domestic footprint once those businesses are sold. With an imminent generational wave of business succession that is especially pronounced in the manufacturing sector, employee ownership is an increasingly important tool to strengthen our economic security including the retirement security of American workers and families. Reindustrializing America requires a proactive strategy to confront business succession— employee ownership is uniquely positioned to convert these risks into an enduring competitive advantage.

Research updates

Monthly research updates from Lafayette Square Institute.

Occasional updates from LSI researchers, including new publications, data releases, and policy analysis on housing, employee ownership, and job quality.